‘Not a Single Word to Help the 33 Million Small Businesses’: Mark Cuban’s Concerns About Impact of Tariffs

A close-up shot of Mark Cuban_ Image by Joe Seer via Shutterstock_

In a sharply worded post on BlueSky, billionaire entrepreneur and investor Mark Cuban criticized President Donald Trump’s administration for failing to address the mounting crisis facing America’s roughly 33 million small businesses amid a new wave of aggressive tariffs on Chinese imports. 

“Not a single word to help the 33m small businesses in this country. Not from anyone in the administration,” Cuban said. He continued, “So many buy from China, and don't have alternatives. So many didn’t have the cash to front run the tariffs and buy inventory.”

Cuban’s post exemplifies a problem facing millions of American small businesses who don’t have the ear of the president. As entrepreneurs struggle to keep pace with rapidly changing trade policy that has significantly increased their operational costs, it’s clear some reprieve is necessary or America could quickly spiral into a recession. Cuban’s remarks underscore a growing sentiment among business owners and economists alike: The backbone of the American economy is being quietly but severely weakened.

Trump’s Tariff Blitz and the Economic Fallout

Since returning to office in January, President Donald Trump has reignited his tariff-heavy trade agenda with even greater intensity. Recently, the administration imposed sweeping new tariffs on a broad range of Chinese goods, citing national security and economic competitiveness.

These moves, while applauded by certain domestic manufacturing and policy groups, have triggered price hikes for thousands of goods that many U.S. small businesses rely on. Nearly every industry is currently reeling from the impact of these tariffs. The administration has touted the tariffs as a strategy to bring manufacturing back to the U.S., but critics argue the policy is being implemented without sufficient transitional support for those caught in the crossfire.

Last week, Trump began temporarily rolling back certain tariffs, but the volatility continues to be a cause of concern for businesses around the globe. 

Don't Miss: 

Small Businesses: Stuck Without Alternatives

Cuban’s frustration highlights a fundamental issue: Small businesses don’t have the same agility as multinational corporations. Many rely on long-standing relationships with Chinese suppliers, particularly in industries like fashion, consumer tech, home goods, and specialty manufacturing.

Finding new vendors in other countries — or onshoring production — takes time, capital, and scale. Most small businesses don’t have any of those luxuries. And even when alternative suppliers exist, they often come with higher prices and longer lead times.

Moreover, Cuban correctly points out that many small businesses lacked the cash flow to preorder large volumes of inventory before the tariffs took effect. As a result, they’re now faced with shockingly higher costs for their next shipment, and without any short-term way to pass those costs onto consumers.

The Financing Squeeze

The situation is further exacerbated by an unforgiving credit environment. Despite inflation beginning to cool, interest rates remain high, leaving small businesses with limited access to affordable financing. Lines of credit are shrinking, loan applications are being rejected at higher rates, and alternative financing options often come with predatory terms.

This creates a catch-22: Business owners need capital to buy inventory before costs rise further, but the cost of capital itself is prohibitive. For many, it’s an unsustainable scenario.

Policy Silence — and Growing Tension

What may be most alarming about Cuban’s post isn’t just the economic analysis; it’s the political critique. His accusation that no one in the administration has spoken up for small business owners strikes at the heart of growing bipartisan frustration with how the government is handling the situation.

While large corporations and industrial lobbies have secured carve-outs and subsidies in past trade negotiations, small businesses often get little more than lip service. So far, there have been no announcements offering targeted relief, trade assistance, or tax credits for businesses harmed by the new tariffs.

Many worry this could lead to a wave of closures, particularly among retailers, manufacturers, and e-commerce operations that rely on Chinese imports.

Economic Ripple Effects

The longer-term economic consequences could be substantial. Small businesses make up the majority of all U.S. businesses and employ nearly half of the private workforce. Their contraction doesn’t just affect local economies — it reverberates nationally through reduced consumer spending, layoffs, and declining tax revenues.

While there’s no clear answer for what needs to be done, there are certainly plenty of options on the table. For example: 

  • Tariff relief credits for small importers below a certain revenue threshold
  • Short-term Small Business Administration (SBA)-backed bridge loans with low interest and delayed repayment
  • Expanded Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) to help businesses pivot supply chains
  • Inventory purchasing grants or tax incentives to offset sudden cost hikes
  • National procurement assistance to facilitate group buying and economies of scale
  • Grants, tax credits or other incentives for companies that successfully onshore their supply chain into the U.S.

None of these solutions, or others, have been formally adopted or proposed by the current administration. Mark Cuban’s influence, as both a billionaire investor and vocal advocate for entrepreneurs, adds weight to the concerns small businesses have been voicing for weeks. His willingness to publicly call out the lack of federal response may galvanize broader attention and be a catalyst for a policy shift.

If history is any guide, the longer the government waits to intervene, the more permanent the damage may be.


On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.